Yes, some psychologists do debate the merits of IQ. The ones who do resent the tests because they're not very bright. Why don't you take a good hard long look at those who have an issue with it?
Again, you didn't read what I wrote. I didn't say that she had an IQ between 95 and 100. That was a doctor - a neurologist. You need to check my sources. You need to learn how to read for accurate information.
Everything I wrote in that article is accurate. Please read my 'about' section.' I am not in the habit of writing bs. Also, for your information, fiction goes nowhere on Medium - just to be helpful to you.
Lastly, and I mean lastly, because we're done.
QUOTE: Along these same lines, critics such as Keith Stanovich do not dispute the capacity of IQ test scores to predict some kinds of achievement, but argue that basing a concept of intelligence on IQ test scores alone neglects other important aspects of mental ability. Robert Sternberg, another significant critic of IQ as the main measure of human cognitive abilities, argued that reducing the concept of intelligence to the measure of g does not fully account for the different skills and knowledge types that produce success in human society.[96] Despite these objections, clinical psychologists generally regard IQ scores as having sufficient statistical validity for many clinical purposes.
