H,
I think you either don't understand what I wrote, or you don't understand what I asked. Probably both.
What I wrote was that the Russians were using genocidal practices against the Ukrainians.
Now you eitther agree with that or you don't.
With respect, I don't listen or watch videos. I fidn them to slow to divulge information. I can take one minute to read what is said in five minutes in a video.
I read the article by Redmayne Titley and then I researched him. I would be hesitent to believe him about anything. Link below.
That said. I am not living in the United States. I have access to international media, and, amongst other things, the BBC has feet on the ground in Uraine. And there are other jounalists as well. I am very hesitant to believe people who have a criminal record, a the author of the article you sent me have.
My late father was amongst other things a journalist, and I trained at the London school of journalism. I also worked for the South African branch of the Guardian at one point. Believe it or not, every bit of mainstream journalism is not corrupt or wrong.
I gather from what you say that Russia did not invade Ukraine, and if it did, it had ever right to do so because Ukraine was guilty of certain things, and therefore Russia is entitled to murder civilians and bomb residential buildings. Oh, wait, the purposeful bombing of residential buildings didn't really take place. It is just western propaganda.
I think it's important to remember that agreement between any two people is difficult, agreement between two countries is even more difficult, and the likelihood of 30 or 40 or 100 countries all agreeing to report the same thing is probably not possible.
You might also take a look at the piece of slime that is reporting from the Ukraine in the one vidoe - the only one I attempted to look at. I find a better use of my time to figure out who he was.
As a political activist and a journalist, I am accustomed to looking at sources of information. I suggest you do the same.
