Again, it's not laziness. It's just that people don't think that what they are offered is worth working for. I see no reason why I should work for peanuts for someone. People are forced to take jobs in order to survive. That doesn't mean that they thinkt hat what they are being paid is a fair exchange.

It's not laziness. It's resistance against unethical exploitation.

No, I don't think laziness exists.

How do I feel about people who don't pick up after themselves? I think they weren't taught to pick up after themselvs. I grew up in a home with three full time servants. I was never taught to do a single thing for myself. I didn't even realize until I was in my 30s that this was a problem for others.

What you don't make allowances for is that other people:

1. Weren't taught the same things you were.

2. May not have the ability to do 2 or 3 things at once. Nobody realized I was autistic. They couldn't see inside my brain. What they did see was my IQ scores, i.e. 165 to off-the-graph. So they assumed that the reason I wasn't working was because I was lazy. In reality, there were three factors - Extreme abuse at home (and I was traumatized), Asperger's and an auditory processing disorder. Invisible disabilities cannot be seen.

3. Lack of motivation due to rewards not being high enough. Nobody has an ethical obligation to be exploited by others. If people don't want to work for peanuts, as is now happening, maybe it's time that management realized that if they aren't prepared to work for peanuts, why should others?

4. About half the people have below average to below average intelligence. They genuinely do not understand things the way people of higher intelligence do. Their brains are not only less able to deduce but have less capacity to work rapidly.

My point is that you have no moral right to determine why people aren't doing the work. You have no evidence because you have not seen inside their heads.